Log In | Register
Constitutional authority speaks...
Dear Mitch:
Elections haven't worked, and therefore the Constitution must be changed?
What a SILLY thing for you to say! How exactly does that follow?
The premise that elections haven’t worked can lead to any number of conclusions.
For example. I could argue that since elections haven't worked, elections themselves should be abolished.
Or, I could say that since elections haven’t worked, the governments that they create should be abolished. That may not be far from the intention of some.
Might you be faking a ‘crisis’ to create a ‘solution’ as a vehicle that surreptitiously secures another agenda entirely, or are you too incompetent to know what you're doing? Why the shoddy logic?
